Amalungelo obunikazi asisiza ekuboneni ngqo ukuthi yibuphi ubuchwepheshe i-Apple egxile kubo futhi futhi asivumele ukuthi siphuphe kancane noma sidlale ukuqagela ukuthi ikusasa lezinsimbi zenkampani yeCupertino lizoba njani. Kulokhu, esinakho etafuleni yilungelo lobunikazi elisha lapho kungabonakala khona ngokucacile ikhibhodi engenazo izinkinobho ezibonakalayo zama-iPads noma izikrini ezinkulu okusho ukuthi i-Apple ingacubungula noma ihlole ukusetshenziswa kwekhibhodi ehluke ngokuphelele yale divayisi futhi ingayisebenzisa nakuma-Macs.
Lo akuwona umqondo okhona kude, sesivele sinamaqembu angaphandle kwe-Apple asebenzisa lolu hlobo lobuchwepheshe kumadivayisi abo futhi kuyiqiniso ukuthi i-Apple isebenza njalo ukwenza ngcono obunye bobuchwepheshe obukhona, njengalokhu abenza ngeTouch ID noma I-Face ID phakathi kwabanye, ngakho-ke singacabanga ukuthi kuleli cala elithile kungathuthukiswa ikhibhodi ye-iPad ngokuzayo kweMacBooks.
Sebenzisa izinzwa ze-haptic ukulingisa ukuchofoza ikhibhodi njenge-MacBook TouchPad, ukuba nesikrini sokuthinta ezansi ngobukhulu obuncane kunekhibhodi uqobo noma ngisho nokwenza ngcono ukukhanyisa amakhibhodi angangena ezinhlelweni ze-Apple zibona le patent.
Ukususa amakhibhodi aphathekayo we-Mac ku-swoop eyodwa akuwona umsebenzi olula, kude nayo, ngaphezu kwalokho umsebenzisi kuzodingeka azivumelanise nayo futhi sengivele ngithuthukisa ukuthi kimi kungangibiza kakhulu kusukela lapho ngibhala nge i-iPad, kuyangibiza. Kunoma ikuphi, okubalulekile ukuthi sikujwayele njengoba kwenzekile ngekhibhodi uvemvane noma okufanayo, kepha ukususa ikhibhodi ebonakalayo kuyisinyathelo esikhulu impela kumaMac. Okwamanje kunelungelo lobunikazi, lapho-ke kusazobonwa ukuthi igcina ifinyelele emaqenjini noma cha. Amalungelo obunikazi e-Apple anjalo futhi okwamanje lokhu kuhlobene ne-iPad, kepha ngeke kusimangaze ukubona into enjengale kuma-Macs ngokuzayo.