Ndihlala ndicinga ngayo, ihlala indinika imvakalelo, kodwa andikaze ndiyicikide kuyo: uyilo lweemveliso ezintsha zika-Apple, ngakumbi iMac Pro, indikhumbuze kakhulu ngezinto zakudala Braun. Ibihlala iyinto engekho zingqondweni, kude kube ziintsuku ezidlulileyo ndiqale ngophando oluncinci ukuxhasa okanye ukulahla umbono.
Kwaye akukho kwanto ngaphandle kokhangelo lukaGoogle olwaneleyo lokuqinisekisa, kancinci kancinci, ukukrokrela. Kwaye uphando lwaphela kuba umntu wayesele ebhalile ngayo: eGizmodo bapapasha inqaku elisemagqabini apho bahlalutya khona lo mzekeliso, kunye nemifanekiso ethetha njengale sinayo ngasentla.
Inqaku kukuba impembelelo ye Ukutya iinkunzi zeegusha (Umyili weBraun kwiminyaka yama-50 kunye neye-60) kumlawuli woyilo weCupertino, UJonathan Ive, inkulu kakhulu. Iinkunzi zeegusha zazingomnye wabameli ababalulekileyo bentshukumo yeFomu yeGute, eyaqhubeka nembono yoyilo lweengcinga ezikhuthazwa yiBauhaus kunye neSikolo seUlm, esinombono oqhelekileyo ungashwankathelwa kwimithetho "encinci kuninzi" kunye "nefom" msgstr "indlela elandelwayo".
Ngaba ke kufuneka siqonde ukuba iApple isisiseko sokukhuphela iimveliso zeBraun, ngaphandle kokuyila ngokwenene? Kunzima ukuwuphendula loo mbuzo, kodwa ngokuqinisekileyo iapile inetyala kakhulu kuyilo lweBraun.
Kodwa kukho enye inqaku. Kwenzeka njani ukuba iApple, inkampani ye-avant-garde, isekele uyilo lwayo kwimibono yentshukumo eyaqala ukwaliwa kakhulu kwiminyaka ye-80, xa bekusele kuthathelwa ingqalelo ukuba izinto eziyilwe ngombono kuphela wokusebenza kuyadika kwaye izinto akufuneki zisebenze kuphela, kodwa ngaba kufuneka zenze iqhina elifanelekileyo nomsebenzisi? Kwenzeka njani ukuba izinto ze-Apple zisekwe kwimibono yokusebenza kodwa ke zenze umlutha ongaka?
Ndicinga ukuba impendulo yindida, into ephikisayo yeyokuba ayisiyiyo paradox: isitshixo sikwimo elungileyo, yiyo ke loo nto gute ekugqibeleni.
Inqaku kwiGizmodo | Iimveliso zeBraun zango-1960 Zibambe Iimfihlo Kwikamva lika-Apple