Here's how the new iPad Pro manages storage

iPad-Pro

If there is one thing that is clear, it is that iPad Pro It is the beginning of the end of laptops for many users. The time has come to segment users a little more and focus on everyone who wants extreme portability coupled with a touch screen on the iPad Pro. 

This device comes with a high-performance processor that they have called A9X that is 1,6 times faster than the one in the iPad Air 2, the A8X. Another novelty of this giant iPad, not counting the technology of its screen and the new Apple Pencil is the way it manages storage.

When we talk about storage management we are referring to how this "almost" computer manages files that can be large at one point. The answer is that the Cupertino people have created a new storage management system which makes it very fast to handle large files. 

ipad pro

Nothing is yet known about the type of storage that this device uses but we could be facing a new device that could make use of the SSD disks that are already used in computers such as the MacBook Air. Apple has designed a new controller for storage that allows better performance than desktop computersIn this way we achieve very high reading and writing speeds.

To know its performance data, we will have to wait until November, which is when it will begin to arrive in stores at a price of $ 799 for 32 GB WiFi, $ 949 for 128 GB WiFi and $ 1079 for 128 GB WiFi + 4G.


Buy a domain
You are interested in:
The secrets to launching your website successfully

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

*

*

  1. Responsible for the data: Miguel Ángel Gatón
  2. Purpose of the data: Control SPAM, comment management.
  3. Legitimation: Your consent
  4. Communication of the data: The data will not be communicated to third parties except by legal obligation.
  5. Data storage: Database hosted by Occentus Networks (EU)
  6. Rights: At any time you can limit, recover and delete your information.

  1.   Andrés said

    That is the problem, which is an almost computer. I prefer a surface that is a complete computer, with an intel microprocessor, which although they consume more, there is no performance comparison.